In our latest newsletter, Neal Swanson, Director of Portfolio Asset Management, explains why ownership alone doesn’t create performance—and how comprehensive asset management replaces reactive decisions with disciplined, value‑driven strategy.
When we meet with a property owner—whether a multi-generational family, a private investor, or an operating company—the conversation rarely begins with theory. It usually begins with concern:
How do we reduce risk?
How do we increase cash flow?
Are we holding the right properties?
Why does it feel like we are working hard but not advancing the portfolio?
Asset management is the structure that answers those questions.
In my role as Director of Portfolio Asset Management at NAI Elliott, and as an adjunct professor teaching Foundations of Asset Management at Portland State University, I define asset management this way:
“Asset management reduces ownership risk and maximizes property value, cash flow, and long-term ROI through strategic, active oversight.”
That definition reflects how we approach every portfolio we oversee.
Asset Management Is Strategic, Not Operational
One of the first distinctions I make—both with clients and in the classroom—is between property management and asset management.
The Institute of Real Estate Management (IREM) describes asset management as the function responsible for decisions that impact a property’s financial performance, particularly those that add value, while property management focuses more directly on daily operational execution.
In practice, property management keeps the building operating, while asset management ensures the building is performing.
Property managers handle maintenance, vendor coordination, collections, and tenant communication. Asset managers define strategy: leasing direction, capital allocation, refinancing decisions, risk mitigation, hold/sell analysis, and portfolio alignment.
“If strategic oversight is absent, portfolios drift. And drift erodes value.”
Different Types of Asset Managers
Over time, we’ve observed that not all asset managers are wired the same way. In commercial real estate, asset managers generally fall into two core strengths: Financial management strength, and human resource and operational leadership strength.
From those strengths, four common profiles tend to emerge:
Analytical Asset Managers
These professionals excel in modeling, forecasting, underwriting, and financial structuring. They understand debt, valuation, and capital markets deeply. Their strength lies in numbers, projections, and return optimization.
Operational Asset Managers
These individuals are strong in human management and operational oversight. They drive performance through property managers, leasing teams, and vendors. They excel at accountability, coordination, and execution.
Transactional Asset Managers
These managers focus heavily on acquisitions, dispositions, refinancing, and deal structuring. They are adept at timing markets and structuring exits, but may spend less time on ongoing operational oversight.
Comprehensive Asset Managers
This profile blends strong financial acumen with disciplined human management. Comprehensive asset managers understand modeling, capital, and valuation—but also know how to drive operational execution, leasing strategy, and team accountability.
At NAI Elliott, we pride ourselves on delivering comprehensive asset management. We believe strong financial management without operational leadership leaves value unrealized. Conversely, operational leadership without financial discipline can limit long-term returns. The combination of both positions enables us to best serve our clients.
What Comprehensive Asset Management Looks Like in Practice
Our work centers on helping families and companies define long-term objectives and then overseeing the execution required to move assets from their current state to their desired outcomes.
That requires both financial rigor and disciplined human oversight.
Asset-Level Business Planning
Every property should have a defined business plan that addresses the role an asset plays in the overall portfolio, the three-to-five year objective, leasing initiatives that support the objective, required capital investments, and the anticipated refinance or exit plan:
“Without a written plan, decisions become reactive.”
Leasing as a Strategic Tool
Leasing is revenue management—not simply vacancy reduction.
The Urban Land Institute has long emphasized the importance of managing tenant mix and lease maturity exposure to reduce volatility within portfolios. Concentrated lease expirations or tenant industry exposure create risk that can be mitigated with planning.
Comprehensive asset management ensures that renewal discussions begin early, tenant credit risk is evaluated, downtime is forecasted realistically, and leasing decisions align with long-term portfolio strategy.
Responsible Cash Flow Management
Cash flow predictability is engineered. Capital allocation should have a purpose. Capital should not be reactive; it should be strategic.
Every major capital expenditure must answer one of four questions: Does it increase rent potential? Does it protect occupancy? Does it reduce risk? Does it improve exit value?
Institutional investors often evaluate returns through frameworks like the NCREIF Property Index (NPI), which separates income return from appreciation return. The underlying lesson is simple: NOI growth and asset value growth are related but distinct drivers. Capital allocation decisions must consider both.
Debt and Capital Markets Alignment
Debt structure is part of an asset management strategy. Loan maturities must align with lease maturities. Interest rate exposure must be evaluated realistically. Leverage must match asset risk profile.
When rates shift or capital markets tighten, disciplined asset management becomes even more important. Financing decisions can either protect performance or magnify volatility.
Reporting That Drives Decisions
Standardized reporting frameworks, such as those supported by organizations like NCREIF and PREA, exist because clarity matters. Owners should not receive reports that simply describe the past. Reporting should support decision-making; without consistent reporting and accountability, strategy loses effectiveness.
A responsible asset manager should continuously be answer the following questions with their reporting: Are we on track with NOI targets? Are expenses trending correctly? Is capex delivering expected results? Are leasing assumptions holding?
Asset Management as Risk Reduction
At its core, asset management is about risk. Risk of vacancy, credit, interest rates, capital, and market timing. Through strategic, active oversight, these risks can be materially reduced.
Markets will cycle. That is inevitable. But disciplined asset management positions portfolios to endure downturns and capitalize on recoveries.
A Practical Test for Owners
If you are evaluating your own portfolio, consider these questions:
Does each property have a written, measurable business plan?
Are lease expirations actively managed several years in advance?
Is capital deployment tied to defined return or risk-reduction metrics?
Are reporting metrics standardized across assets?
Is debt structured intentionally in support of strategy?
Are hold, sell, or recapitalization decisions based on defined triggers rather than circumstances?
If those answers are unclear, an opportunity likely exists to reduce risk and maximize your portfolio’s performance.
Final Perspective
Comprehensive asset management is not an added layer of cost. It is a value-creation discipline. The fees for service are often dramatically less than the value generated or savings created. It blends financial rigor with operational leadership. It aligns leasing, capital planning, debt structure, and portfolio strategy into a unified approach. It reduces ownership risk while improving value, cash flow, and long-term return.
Whether we are advising a family stewarding generational assets or a company managing multi-state holdings, my objective remains consistent: define the long-term vision, apply disciplined oversight, and move each asset intentionally toward its target outcome.
In commercial real estate, ownership alone does not create performance. Strategic, comprehensive asset management does.
Receive monthly articles with insider information on the commercial real estate market. Subscribe now
